Sunday, August 31, 2014

Invest2Success Blog Moved to

We have moved our blog articles to your main website now.

Click Here to go to the Invest2Success Site

Once your at the website, click the links on the left column to review the latest news on investing and trading.

Below and on the right column of the Invest2Success Blog you can still access our past blog articles.

Good investing and trading!

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Extra Income with Mortgage REIT's

Getting a Read on Mortgage REITs by Morningstar Investment Research

This high-income vehicle warrants close scrutiny given interest-rate uncertainty.

Question: I've heard that mortgage REITs can be a good way to get extra income. What are the pros and cons of investing in one?

Answer: Mortgage REITs have exploded in popularity in recent years, in part because their yields can be attractive. But as with any high-yielding instrument, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Unless interest-rate conditions are just right, mortgage REITs can run into trouble.

Mortgage REITs (real estate investment trusts) are similar in nature to equity REITs, but with some key differences. Whereas equity REITs invest in commercial or residential properties, passing along to shareholders much of the income they receive, mortgage REITs invest only in commercial or residential mortgages and mortgage-backed securities. The interest payments made on these mortgages generates income for the REIT and, thus, for its shareholders.

Mortgage REITs use their equity or take out loans of their own--often at short-term rates--to initiate or buy mortgages as part of a leveraged strategy. The amount of interest the REIT earns on the mortgage minus its cost to fund or obtain the mortgage becomes the REIT's profit. For example, if the REIT owns a mortgage that requires the borrower to pay 4% interest over 30 years but the REIT can borrow the money to fund the mortgage at a short-term rate of 1%, the REIT banks a profit on this 3-percentage-point difference. Mortgage REITs typically use leverage (additional borrowing) to amplify this spread.

An Income-Generating Vehicle

As with all REITs, mortgage REITs are required by law to pass along most of their income to shareholders, and therein lies their appeal for income-oriented investors: Mortgage REITs offer some of the highest yields of any security type, some in excess of 10%. (It's also worth noting that while REITs don't pay taxes on the dividends they pass along to shareholders, the shareholders themselves must pay them and at ordinary income tax rates rather than at the lower rates applied to qualified dividends.)

In addition to generating income, mortgage REITs can be used to help diversify a portfolio. While REITs in general have become more highly correlated to stocks in recent years due partly to their inclusion in some widely tracked equity indexes, mortgage REITs are more loosely correlated to stocks than equity REITs are.

Some mortgage REITs trade on exchanges like stocks. At the end of 2013, there were 45 listed mortgage REITs on the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ with a total market capitalization of $62 billion, according to figures from the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.

ETFs that invest exclusively in mortgage REITs include iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF (REM), an index-based fund that yielded 13.7% on average over the past year, and Market Vectors Mortgage REIT Income ETF (MORT), which yielded 12.6%. (By contrast, Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ), our analysts' pick for ETF exposure to equity REITs and which excludes mortgage REITs, yielded just 3.1%.)

Now for the Warning Label

Before you rush off to buy mortgage REITs or mortgage REIT funds to get a piece of those juicy yields, make sure you understand the risks that come with them. In particular, mortgage REITs are highly subject to interest-rate risk. For example, as short-term interest rates rise, the REIT may have to pay more to borrow money, potentially reducing the spread between its borrowing costs and the income it receives from the mortgages it owns--thus, reducing its profit (and shareholder dividends). Generally, the more leveraged the mortgage REIT (that is, the more borrowing it does), the greater the potential to feel the squeeze when rates rise. At the same time, if long-term rates rise faster than short-term rates, this increases the spread and the REIT's profit may increase. However, rising long-term rates also could hurt the value of existing mortgages already in the REIT's portfolio, thus, hurting the REIT’s value.

Mortgage REITs typically try to account for various potential short-term scenarios by using hedging strategies based on derivatives such as interest-rate swaps. But their high degree of interest-rate sensitivity generally makes mortgage-REIT yields more volatile than those paid out by equity REITs or stocks.

The Best of Times--But for How Long?

In recent years, mortgage REITs have flourished amid historically low interest rates. However, during periods when rates have risen--or when fears of rising rates have taken hold--mortgage REITs have taken a beating. IShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF's two biggest holdings--Annaly Capital Management (NLY) and American Capital Agency (AGNC)--lost 18.3% and 20.3%, respectively, in 2013, as worries about the end of the Fed's bond-buying stimulus program sent interest rates higher. As rates have drifted lower again this year these REITs have rebounded, with Annaly Capital Management up 24.1% and American Capital Agency up 27.8% as of Aug. 22.

Another potential interest rate-related pitfall for mortgage REITs is prepayment risk--the chances that borrowers will prepay mortgages in order to refinance at lower rates. In such cases, the mortgage REIT no longer receives interest payments at the higher rate and may have to settle for buying mortgages that pay lower rates. While prepayment risk has been a real concern in this era of historically low mortgage rates, it is less likely to be an issue should they continue to rise.

Most residential mortgage REITs are backed by the federal agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which minimizes the credit risk associated with them. However, commercial mortgage REITs lack this protection and may carry some credit risk.

While no one knows for sure if or when interest rates will increase in the coming years, most investors seem to expect they will. How this will affect the performance of mortgage REITs is anyone's guess, but the fact that there is so much uncertainty should give any investor pause.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, August 25, 2014

This Weeks Free Stock Pick - Auto Parts

Visteon Corporation (VC) delivered strong results and provided bullish guidance for 2014 and 2015, leading analysts to revise their estimates upwards. Positive earnings momentum sent the stock back to Zacks rank #1 (Strong Buy) earlier this month.

About the Company

Visteon is a leading global automotive supplier of climate, electronics and interiors products for vehicle manufacturers. It serves original equipment vehicle manufacturers with its technical, manufacturing, sales and service facilities located in 29 countries.

It has corporate offices in Van Buren Township, Michigan; Shanghai, China; and Chelmsford, UK and employs about 24,000 people worldwide.

The company has been transforming from a US centric company with only one major customer to a predominantly Asia-based, multi-customer global enterprise.

Excellent Results and Guidance

On August 6, Visteon reported its Q2 2014 results. Sales for the quarter totaled $1.78 billion, up 11% from the same quarter last year. Adjusted EPS of $1.76 per share was much better than consensus.

Adjusted EBITDA excluding discontinued operations was $175 million, compared with $149 million for the same period a year earlier. The balance sheet position continued to be strong with global cash balances totaling $1.4 billion at the end of the quarter.

Hyundai-Kia accounted for approximately 39% of Q2 sales and Ford accounted for 30%. Among regions, Asia accounted for 51% of sales, Europe 27%, and Americas 22%.

The company now expects 2014 sales of $7.6 billion and adjusted earnings in the range of $2.98 to $3.62 per share. The company also provided preliminary guidance for 2015, which was better than expectations.

Visteon completed the acquisition of the electronics business of Johnson Controls (JCI) in July. The business acquired provides automakers with advanced driver information, infotainment, connectivity and body electronics products and makes Visteon one of the world's three largest suppliers of vehicle cockpit electronics. The company expects that future synergies from JCI integration will drive sales growth and margin expansion.

Business Transformation to be completed soon

The company is nearing the completion of its multi-year restructuring/transformation. After exiting its Interiors business, the company will be comprised of two high-growth / margin businesses—Automotive Climate and Cockpit Electronics

Solid Industry Outlook

Per Zacks Auto Industry Outlook, a strong pent-up demand due to aging vehicles on the U.S. roads along with falling unemployment rate and easier financing have been the key factors in driving the auto sales in the US..

Asian countries, especially China and India, are expected to account for a large portion of growth in the auto industry over the next five to seven years due to their rapidly growing economies. With its strong presence in Asia, VC will definitely benefit from the surging demand for automobiles in that region.

Further recent innovations in consumer electronics technologies will provide significant opportunities for automotive electronics suppliers.

Estimates Moving Upwards

After strong results and updated guidance, analysts have increased their earnings estimates for VC. Zacks consensus estimates for the current and next year are now $3.52 per share and $5.26 per share respectively, up from $3.18 per share and $4.55 per share, 30 days ago.

The Bottom Line

Highly diversified sales footprint (by products, regions as well as customers), offerings across all major cockpit electronics products and continued investments will help VC gain market share in its space and coninue its outperformance.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Friday, August 22, 2014

Stock Market Winning Secrets

Why do some people succeed spectacularly in the market while others fail?

The market is the same for one person as it is the next.

Yet there are plenty of investors underperforming the market even while it's making new all-time highs like now.

So why the big difference in performance between one person and another?

It all boils down to two things:

1) Knowing what works, and

2) Doing what works

While the stock market isn't a perfect science, the fact remains that if you concentrate on what works and stop doing what doesn't, you will most surely succeed in the market.

Knowledge Is Power

We've all heard the old adage, 'knowledge is power'.

It's a great saying because it's true.

And that saying couldn't be truer than when it comes to investing.

Take a look at your last big loser for example. After analyzing what went wrong, you soon discover some piece of information that – 'had you known that, you never would have gotten into it in the first place'.

I'm not talking about things that are unknowable, like surprise announcements that can catch even the most professional of professionals off guard. I'm talking about things that you could have known about or should have known about before you got in.

This is part of 'knowing what works'.

Did you know that roughly half of a stock's price movement can be attributed to the group that it's in?

Did you also know that oftentimes a mediocre stock in a top performing group will outperform a 'great' stock in a poor performing group?

And did you know that the top 50% of Zacks Ranked Industries outperforms the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1?

And did you also know that the top 10% of industries outperformed the most?

Was your last loser in one of the top industries or in one of the bottom industries?

If it was in one of the bottom industries, you should have known to not take a chance on something with a reduced probability of success.

That part is the 'doing what works'. (And not doing what doesn't work.)

That's not to say that stocks in crummy industries won't go up -- they do. And that's not to say that stocks in good industries won't go down -- because they do too.

But more stocks go up in the top industries, and more stocks go down in the bottom industries.

If you follow a set of proven profitable rules, you'll have a higher probability of succeeding.

Know What Works

Did you know that stocks with 'just' double-digit growth rates typically outperform stocks with triple-digit growth rates?

Did you also know that stocks with crazy high growth rates test nearly as poorly as those with the lowest growth rates?

Did your last loser have a spectacular growth rate?

If so, and it got crushed, would you have picked it if you knew that stocks with the highest growth rates have spotty track records?

Once again, this is the 'know what works' part.

It seems logical to think that the companies with the highest growth rates would do the best. But it doesn't always turn out to be the case.

One explanation for this is that sky high growth rates are unsustainable. And the moment a more normal (albeit still good) growth rate emerges, the stock gets a dose of reality as well.

Instead, I have found that comparing a stock to the median growth rate for its industry is the best way to find solid outperformers with a lesser chance to disappoint. And there are growth rate ranges that have proven to work the best.

Did You Know?

Did you know that stocks receiving broker rating upgrades have historically outperformed those with no rating change by more than 1.5 times? And did you know they outperformed stocks receiving downgrades by more than 10 times as much? The next time one of your stocks is upgraded or downgraded, be sure to remember these statistics so you know how the odds stack up and whether they're for you or against you.

Did you know that stocks with a Price to Sales ratio of less than 1 have produced significantly superior results over companies with a Price to Sales ratio greater than those levels? And did you know that those with a Price to Sales ratio of greater than 4 have typically shown to lose money? That doesn't mean that all stocks with a P/S ratio of less than one will go up and those over four will go down, but you can greatly increase your odds of success by following these valuations.

Did you know that by adding two additional filters to the Zacks #1 Rank stocks, it narrows that list down from 200+ stocks to a more manageable 5 stocks? That's what we did with our Filtered Zacks Rank 5 screen that is up 38.4% so far this year vs. the market’s 7.4%.

Do you know how well your stock picking strategies have performed?

Whether good or bad - do you know why?

Do you know if your favorite item to look for is helping you or hurting you?


Click here to get the answers to these questions and more.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, August 18, 2014

This Weeks Free Stock Pick - Semiconductors

Yesterday I got a little bit excited and decided I’d look into the next generation of smartphones. They’re coming out next month. Apple will have another iPhone for you, and Samsung is coming out with a new Galaxy Note S4 for me. Among the fresh features of the next generation are 4k or UltraHD displays and curved glass. But what will remain the same is a great deal of the hardware that’s inside these devices. The computing power and the wireless data receiver semiconductor chips are being made by the same providers who stand to make big bucks when these phones are mass produced over and over again.

Among the chipmakers that are included is TriQuint Semiconductor (TQNT), our Bull of the Day. TriQuint designs, develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range of high performance analog and mixed signal integrated circuits for communications markets. The integrated circuits are incorporated into a variety of communications products, including cellular phones, fiber optic telecom equipment, satellite communications systems, high performance data networking products and aerospace applications.

Miniature Mobile Giant

The vast majority of TriQuint’s operations are focused on the mobile industry. With the world’s demand for mobile data growing exponentially, the wireless industry is rapidly changing to meet this challenge and build the next generation of mobile devices and network infrastructure. As a result, TQNT has an intense focus on LTE content expansion. They seek to deliver premium filters and high-efficiency broadband amplifiers as well as enable dense RF integration with ultra small packaging. Basically it means they are making their chips smaller, more efficient, and more powerful.

Not stopping with mobile devices, TriQuint is gaining exposure in the defense and aerospace business as well. Their transition to products and away from non-strategic foundry is driving revenue and margins for them. Their top customers on the defense front include Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and the US Department of Defense. Their GaN technology offers greater power, smaller size, fewer parts, and higher efficiency then their current competition.

Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy)

The result has been very bullish earnings estimate revisions to go along with a stock price that has been on the rise. This Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) has surprised earnings estimates to the upside for four quarters in a row.

Further, over the last 30 days, three analysts have raised their estimates for the current year and next year. This has pushed consensus up from 31 cents per share for the current year to 51 cents and bounced next year’s consensus up from 50 cents to 75 cents.

All this has contributed to one heck of a run for the stock. After gaping up to break the $10 mark in February of last year, TQNT has barely paused to take a breath on its ride upwards. A few times the stock traded sideways to touch the 25 day moving average shifted by 5 days. After brief consolidation periods and minor sell-offs, TQNT almost always rebounds to head even higher.

Recently the stock has formed a bit of a bullish triangle pattern. Stochastics are in overbought condition so you do have to use a bit of caution when jumping on board. However, you can expect to see stochastics like this during a breakout and that’s exactly what’s happening to TQNT right now. With the spike to a 52-week high intraday today, I’d expect to see an attempt at $20 over the coming weeks.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

The Financial Problem with Europe

The Problem with Europe that Investors are Missing by Market Authority

Europe is struggling, and trade sanctions with Russia are making a bad situation even worse.

Confidence in Germany (as measured by the ZEW index) plunged today to 44.3 in August from 61.8 a month ago. This was dreadful compared to the 54.0 expected by economists.

While the plunging German stock market hinted that weak confidence number was expected, this abysmal reading was categorized as “Grim” by Pantheon Economics’ Claus Vistesen. Here’s a chart of the German ETF over the past year:

As you can see, the selloff from mid-June has erased nearly all the gains in the past year.

Yesterday, we spoke of the paradox of thrift: the idea proposed by Keynes that total savings in an economy will actually decline if everyone chooses to save at the same time. In order to earn income to save, someone else needs to spend. Your savings is someone else’s spending, and vice versa.

This concept underlies the structural problems in Europe, where a unified currency cannot coexist with a stratified political system. While most investors dismiss Europe’s problems as originating in the social democracies of southern Europe- this could not be further from the truth. It’s a very common mistake to moralize the southern Europeans (Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain) as “lazy, government-supported wine-drinkers relaxing on the Mediterranean”. After all, if you’ve spent time in vacation destinations along the Mediterranean, it clearly feels like a way of life.

Here’s the truth: Europe’s problems originate in a savings-consumption imbalance that a common currency cannot resolve in the traditional manner of flexible currency markets. I know this is a mouthful so allow me to explain.

In the late 1990s, the German government passed legislation to restrain the labor wage share of GDP. This made their labor markets among the most competitive in the world, increased exports, and forced up the savings rate. When the Euro was adopted in 1999, the fate of Germany’s currency no longer rested on its own economy.

As a result of these programs and a unified currency, German deficits of the 1990s quickly swung to surpluses. Remember, someone’s savings is also someone else’s spending. The belt tightening in Germany caused savings to flow to south Europe. This resulted in an unsustainable rise in consumption in Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Spain. German exports increased and manufacturing shifted from the rest of Europe to Germany. The inflow of capital to Southern Europe ignited real estate bubbles which resulted in even more consumption as sky-high housing prices made everyone feel rich.

Before the Euro, an inflow of German savings into Spain would be resolved by a drop in the Spanish peseta. A weakened Spanish currency would make their labor and export markets more competitive and the trade imbalance would eventually remedy itself. Unfortunately, there is no longer a mechanism to fix these capital imbalances as the currency is now shared by all. German savings gets trapped in Spain in the form of excess credit and higher real estate prices.

To compound the problems even further, the EU mismanaged matters from the start. Instead of identifying the problem and making southern Europe labor markets more competitive (and thus increase their exports), the EU administered strict austerity programs which weakened these economies and drove debt levels and interest rates even higher.

Again, the Germans are to blame here. To make southern Europe labor markets more competitive would have resulted in wage inflation in Germany. There is still an inflation paranoia among German central bankers since the hyperinflation of the 1920s Weimar Republic led to the rise of the National Socialists (the Nazis). Germans avoid inflationary measures like the plague.

The austerity measures forced on southern Europe pushed the Eurozone to the brink of collapse. Sovereign interest rates skyrocketed above the dreaded 7% level and creditors worried that governments would be unable to finance their runaway deficits. In July 2012, the Euro was briefly rescued when European Central Bank President Mario Draghi proclaimed they will do “whatever it takes” to save debtor nations.

To be certain, all is not well in Euro land. The austerity programs are causing a political shift as hard right-wing nationalist parties are increasingly winning seats in parliaments. This will lead to less political cooperation and more economic turmoil. Unless Germany takes it upon itself to allow domestic inflation and adjust the imbalances, there are more dark days ahead.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, August 11, 2014

Investing in Travel and Lodging Earnings Growth

Expedia, Inc. (EXPE) recently crushed the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the second quarter as demand for travel and travel services strengthened. This Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) is expected to see double digit earnings growth both this year and next.

Expedia is one of the most recognizable online travel companies. It now has an extensive list of brands including,, Hotwire, Egencia,, trivago,, Expedia CruiseShip Centers and eLong, the second largest online travel company in China.

Expedia Beat By 38.4% in Q2

On July 31, Expedia reported its second quarter results and easily beat the Zacks Consensus by 26 cents. Earnings were $0.94 compared to the consensus of $0.68.

Revenue jumped 24% to $1.49 billion from $1.21 billion a year ago. The other metrics also showed solid growth with Room Night growth rising 28% versus 19% a year ago and Gross Bookings jumping 29% due to room night and air ticket growth.

The quarter was boosted by the marketing partnership with Travelocity, which it entered into in the fourth quarter of 2013. That deal contributed 400 basis points of the room night growth.

Analysts Are Bullish

The analysts liked what they heard as 6 estimates were revised higher for 2014 but it wasn't just 2014 they were excited about. Six estimates were also revised higher for 2015.

Expedia isn't cooling off. Earnings are expected to rise 39.6% in 2014 and another 23.6% in 2015.

The company also recently rewarded shareholders by raising its dividend by 20% to $0.18 a quarter. That's a yield of 0.8%.

Shares At 2-Year High

Expedia shares have been on the move for most of 2014. They recently hit a new 2-year high.

The company isn't cheap though, with a forward P/E of 24 but that puts it in line with its high growth competitors. You're buying it for the growth, which it has plenty of.

If you're looking to cash in on the strong demand in travel, Expedia is one stock to keep on your short list.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Thursday, August 07, 2014

Profiting from Market Volatility and Some Institutional Insight

The persistently low market volatility has been an unending source of discussion for analysts, pundits and traders. And rightfully so — the low volatility environment that is a major characteristic of grinding bull markets (mid-1990s, 2003–2007, and late 2011–present; see chart below) has not only changed the trading strategies for options writers but has also given equities traders a seeming carte blanche to pile into the markets.

The sometimes wacky, sometimes useful Business Insiders website has just put out its “Most Important Charts” roundup, where serious analysts and a few traders send in their contributions. Not surprisingly, low volatility visuals often show up along with Chinese debt & housing, Fed QE explanations and several on the U.S. housing market and employment picture. I’ve included a couple of my favorites below (yes I did slog through all 91 charts for you loyal readers…!).

2014 Market Performance VS. Implied Volatility Forecast

First up is a chart that I found interesting because it shows, in a very useable format, a visual interpretation of implied volatility. Implied volatility is a mathematical forecast of price’s future variability. In this chart, Jared Woodard, Equity Derivatives Strategist at BGC Partners took the beginning-of-the-year price projections from a group of analysts for each of the past four years and projected them out as pink parabolic cones. These cones represent the implied range based on options prices at the beginning of the year:

A few observations:

This year’s market movement so far has been well within the implied range.

There is some upside still available along with some significant downside possible.

We’ve already exceeded the 14 analysts’ median target for the year.

Last year, the market showed true outperformance.

Even the huge drop in 2011 when U.S. debt was downgraded amid the early stages of the European debt crisis was contained within this definition of implied annual range.

Small Caps & Large Caps Volatility Ratio

In our last chart (below) you can see the ratio of the Russell 2000 Volatility Index divided by the S&P 500 Volatility Index. The chart shows the 30-day implied volatility between small cap and large cap stocks. David Marquart, Portfolio Manager at Quad Capital contributed this chart and note that it ends right on July 17th. The Malaysian airliner was tragically shot down earlier that day over eastern Ukraine which sent equity prices down across the board. The ratio is significantly lower now at 1.475, though still in the upper end of the range:


Marquart interprets this divergence as a shift in risk sentiment from higher-beta assets.

His second insight is that this chart highlights the correlation opportunities that volatility traders look to exploit until implied volatilities begin to realize historical levels again.

Both of these are very astute interpretations; remember that implied volatility goes up as price goes down. This means the Russell has retreated significantly from its record highs while the S&P has not…

Insights from an Institutional Trading Desk

Here are a few closing thoughts on a lesser known aspect of volatility. An institutional trading desk that we work with told us that the implied volatility skew is at the highest levels seen since the real estate / credit bubble burst.

Volatility skew is the difference between the price for out-of-the-money (OTM) puts vs. OTM calls. Since the 1987 Black Monday crash, this skew has been persistent and significant but the trading desk reports that the skew on the S&P 500 is currently at an extreme. That is, puts are very expensive and calls are relatively cheap. A primary impact on institutional investors is that the buy-write strategy (where a firm sells or “writes” a call option to produce income and hedge the position) has dwindled to almost nothing.

The trading desk manager cautioned us that volatility really is creeping into the market but not showing up in traditional VIX calculations. All investors and traders should heed this warning.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, August 04, 2014

Investing in Semiconductor Technology Earnings Growth

Avago Technologies (AVGO), a Singapore incorporated company with joint headquarters in San Jose, California, is a leading designer, developer, and supplier of a broad range of analog semiconductor devices and digital, mixed signal, and optoelectronics components and subsystems. These innovations are used in wide range of wireless, wireline, and industrial applications.

Avago started as a Hewlett Packard (HPQ) semiconductor division in the 1960's and was later a part of Agilent that was spun-off from HP with an IPO in 2009. The $18 billion company makes radio frequency chips that are used in smartphones by Apple (AAPL), Samsung and other mobile device manufacturers.

Avago products primarily serve four markets: Enterprise Storage (38% of FY 2013 revenue), Wireless Communications (25%), Wired Infrastructure (23%), and Industrial & Other (14%). It has a diversified revenue model with 37% of its FY 2013 revenue derived from China, 20% from North America, 10% from Europe and 33% from the rest of the world.

Solid Q2 Report

On May 29, Avago reported its financial results for Q2 of its fiscal year 2014, ended May 4. Net income for the quarter was $158 million or $0.61 per share, up from net income of $134 million or $0.53 per share for the prior quarter and net income of $113 million or $0.45 per share in Q2 last year.

According to the management, “our wireless business came in significantly above our expectations due to strong product ramps for our FBAR-related products into multiple Asian Smartphone OEMs. We also saw resurgence in Industrial re-sales through our distributors, especially in Europe and Japan”.

On May 6, Avago closed the acquisition of LSI Corporation. Subsequent to the acquisition Avago joined the S&P 500 index, replacing LSI Logic.

Vertical EPS Revisions

In mid-June, my colleague Neena Mishra wrote on Avago as Bull of the Day and noted "As a result of continued solid performance, the Zacks Consensus Estimates for FY 2014 and 2015 have increased to $3.29 per share and $4.51 per share." The EPS table below shows the most recent consensus estimates and explains whey the stock became a Zacks #1 Rank again this month as analysts kept raising their numbers.

You can also see that these are the kind of implied growth rates that make growth stock portfolio managers salivate. What this table doesn't show you is where those consensus EPS estimates were before the most recent company guidance. 2014 estimates were raised from $3.01 to $3.31 (+10%) and 2015 estimates were hiked a whopping 31% from $3.50 to $4.59. That's a powerful bump in the company's earnings momentum and outlook.

Analysts and Funds Target Higher Prices

After that earnings report and the subsequent estimate bumps, I took a look at this Zacks #1 Rank to see if it had something else that makes it a buy for me: strong institutional interest. I found that the $275 billion Capital Research Investors disclosed a big position of 25.8 million shares (10% of the company) in early May in a 13G filing.

This was likely in reaction to the company being added to the S&P 500 after they closed their acquisition of LSI. But knowing some of the holdings and strategies of Capital Research, a sister fund of the equally large Capital World Investors, this is a growth play for them as well.

In July, Stern Agee analysts reiterated why Avago had been recently added to the firm's Best Ideas list with a $93 price target, noting that "execution discipline and product leadership make it top holding."

The analysts hosted investor meetings with AVGO's CFO and gave these "key takeaways: 1) expect a strong 2H with China builds and marquee phones, no supply chain slowdown, 2) LSI synergies running ahead of time line driving upside GM-OM versus consensus, 3) increasing 2H14-2015 Wireless content as 4G ramp focuses handset OEMs on FBAR as key, and 4) stable HDD, Wired 40G Bi-Di ramps, and hyperscale storage demand, combined with a focus on execution, should make AVGO a top L-T stock. Raising estimates and PT to $93."

And after Apple's earnings, Oppenheimer analysts, who have an Outperform rating on AVGO shares, were even more positive. Here's what they had to say...

"AAPL represents ~15-20% of Avago sales before the acquisition of LSI. The company primarily supplies RF filter and power amplifier components in the iPhone/iPad. Following the LSI acquisition and AAPLs move back to a single SKU for iPhone 6 we believe AVGO could see 30%+ content gains on iPhone 6."

Bottom line: In a strong semiconductor industry, this is one large cap name I want to own for growth with solid business footholds in both enterprise networking and mobile devices. They would seem to benefit from all dimensions of a more connected world.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Thursday, July 31, 2014

The Long-Term Bullish Bias of the Equities Market

Twenty-Two Years of Massive Outperformance - What Can We Learn?

By Dr Van Tharp Trading Education Institute

A recent CNBC interview with hedge fund honcho Leon Cooperman, founder of Omega Overseas Partners, caught my attention for several reasons. The first was a genuine curiosity as to how this guy has been able to continually outperform the market with a huge account for so many years. Second, I wanted to see if there are any lessons that we could learn from him. And third, my business partner had run money for Cooperman for a number of years and had told many Cooperman stories already but I couldn’t wait to ask him a few more questions about this maven.

One Maven Talks About Another

My business partner, Christopher Castroviejo, is a 35+ year Wall Street veteran who worked both the sell side (brokerage) and buy side (hedge fund, money management). In the mid-1990s, Christopher and his firm were well known as one of the few hedge funds who successfully ran a short book. Cooperman had heard this and sent his right-hand man, Doug Kass, over to check out the operation. Kass and Cooperman were impressed enough to give Christopher’s firm $50 million to run on the short side as a hedge for the rest of their book. And for the next five years, Christopher and Cooperman had frequent discussions about how this chunk of money was being managed.

I asked Christopher what stood out about those interactions, and here’s a list of Christopher’s thoughts on Leon Cooperman in no particular order:

One thing that stood out plainly was that Cooperman was (and remains!) a superb fundamental analyst. He took nothing at face value and always dug deeper into the information in order to form his own opinions.

Christopher was impressed by his intense discipline – he believed hard work always paid off.

He always advocated “love what you do”.

Cooperman played the game in line with what he believed and where he saw his strengths. He was not going to play an institutional-style game with low volatility returns.

When Christopher ran Cooperman’s short book, he noted Cooperman’s great courage in his convictions. Even with the courage to stay the course, however, he always challenged his positions to make sure that nothing fundamental to the trade had changed. He asked Christopher three words countless times, “Are you sure?” and that refrain still rings in Christopher’s ears. Even with his constant checking and curiosity he would stick with many (though not all) positions that were well-reasoned.

Cooperman would frequently call and ask for a review of the position, and he wasn’t shy about changing course with his whole book, even if he liked individual positions. He realized how important — as well as how difficult— hedging was on the short side and he would insist on long periods of holding his short account totally in cash or mostly in cash.

As you can tell from these comments, he was very hands on — very on top of what was happening, and thanks to his work ethic, he really knew the details.

Like Christopher’s grandfather, Bernard Smith — Cooperman believed that you always had to be bullish on something. This is undoubtedly why he cashed in recoveries better than anyone in the business (see his return figures below).

One of his main edges is a thorough knowledge of the fundamentals that he matched so well to his ability to foresee upcoming business cycle trends.

Now for That Head-Spinning Track Record:

Here is Cooperman’s Omega Partners’ track record that was included in the CNBC interview:

Click the Image Below for a Larger View

Cooperman averaged an annual return of 14.6% compounded vs. 9.3% for the S&P 500 during the same period. If that isn’t impressive enough, note that his figures are net of fees — meaning that the actual returns were significantly higher!

Here are some observations:

He does have down years, but knows who he is & what his strengths are.

He can have significant drawdowns, but his returns on rebounds (1993, 2003 and 2009) are nothing short of stunning.

Looking at his current top holdings (none more than 3.2% of capital): Sprint, SandRidge Energy, AIG, Sirius XM, Citigroup, Tribune, Tetragon Financial, Telenet Group, Dish Network and Chimera Investment, you can tell that he is a stock picker (and a value guy) and not one to jump on the same bandwagon just because other managers are.

What Can We Learn From Mr. Cooperman?

The first thing that leaps out after talking to Christopher and digging into the CNBC interview is that Cooperman is a guy who trades his beliefs. He believes in the long-term bullish bias of the equities market and is quick to capitalize on upturns after down periods. In addition, specialization works — his specialty is fundamental analysis. Lastly, when you have edge, have the courage to stick to your convictions; don’t get shaken out after a few rough trades. Let the law of large numbers and the confidence in your plan carry you through.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

How to Start a Financial Crisis Part 3

Click Here to Read Part 1

Click Here to Read Part 2

First, in the last three decades, low interest rates and increases in productivity are mostly responsible for record amounts of corporate balance sheet cash. That cash needs to go somewhere.

Second, banks devised a pawn-like scheme to take corporate balance sheet cash and use it to finance the purchase of higher-yielding securities, earning the difference in what they pay to borrow and what they earn on the purchase.

Third, the borrowed cash needed to be backed by AAA-rated collateral. To fulfill this need, Wall Street securitized packages of loans, thereby creating a new form of AAA-rated collateral.

This spawned the “shadow banking system”: corporations would lend money to banks through repo and commercial paper markets in exchange for a low interest rate and the banks would back these loans with securitized products. Even after Dodd-Frank, this system still remains largely unregulated.

Today, I’ll explain how the whole process led to higher asset prices through the creation of more credit.

Think of it like this: banks enter a pawn shop with a gold chain. The pawnbroker lends the banker $1000 at a 1% interest rate and keeps the gold chain as collateral. Banks take the $1000 and purchase another gold chain, and promptly return to the pawn shop to borrow another $1000. This process is repeated ad infinitum until all the cash on corporate balance sheets has been lent to finance the available supply of gold chains.

Suppose these gold chains weren’t your average run-of-the-mill gold chains. These gold chains have Mr T-like mystical powers and pay a 6% dividend to the owner. For every $1000 that the bank borrowed from the pawn shop at 1%, they earn a 5% return (the difference between what the bank borrows and what it receives). Each time the bank is due to pay the pawnbroker back the original $1000, he tells him to keep the gold chain and renews the agreement on the funds for 1%. Thus, borrowing money from the pawn shop to finance the purchase of higher yielding gold chains is a very lucrative endeavor.

So what happens to the market in gold chains? Well, if banks are using borrowed money to purchase gold chains, the price of gold chains is going to increase rapidly as demand outpaces supply. And the bankers can now take these gold chains with inflated valuations and use them to extract even more money from lenders.

However, the value of gold chains is increasing not as a function of buyers’ incomes, but through the introduction of more leverage from corporate balance sheets. As the leverage in the pawn system increases, so does the ratio between price and incomes. At some point, buyers’ incomes can no longer support the price of gold chains.

And this is precisely what happened to the housing markets in the early aughts as the price to income ratio of homes was boosted by the shadow banking market.

However, as the available supply of gold chains dissipated, bankers would sometimes deposit fool’s gold (subprime). The pawnbrokers started to worry about phony loans in early 2007, and began requiring more collateral to back their loans. Instead of lending at 100% of the collateral deposited, pawnbrokers would only issue funds equal to 90% of the value of the collateral. Slowly, this started to drain leverage from the system.

And as leverage fell, so did the value of the gold chains, which further arrested the flow of cash from corporate balance sheets. This vicious cycle repeated itself until the pawnbrokers decided that all gold chains were worthless and wanted their money back. Since the banks didn’t have the cash on hand, they needed to immediately liquidate gold chains into a market where there were no buyers. Lehman failed overnight, and the government was forced to respond by providing the banks with $1 trillion in capital.

The 2008 financial crisis was a run on the shadow banking market caused by a loss of confidence in the debt owed by banks. There were similarities to the bank runs of the 19th century, however, this time it was institutions that were lining up to retrieve their cash and not retail depositors.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, July 28, 2014

Investing in High End Jewelry Sales Earnings Growth

2014 has been an interesting year for retailers to say the least. Several clothing stores have had horrendous first half results as changing tastes have hit many companies hard. Meanwhile, in the restaurant side of the retail space, a similar trend has taken place as ‘higher quality’ companies are leaving their value-oriented counterparts in the dust.

This trend of high end outperforming lower end or value in the retail world is one of the bigger stories in this sector so far this year. And for a classic stock example of this that may still have more room to run as we close out the year, investors have to look no further than Tiffany & Co (TIF).

TIF in Focus

Tiffany & Co is a New York City-based jewelry retailer, specializing in fine and solitary jewelry, though the company also sells watches, perfumes, and accessories as well. The company is obviously operating in the high end corner of the market, and like many of its high end peers across the retail world (no matter the industry), it is really turning up the heat as of late in terms of stock price appreciation, including a 20% move higher in the past six months alone.

A big reason for this jump is the recent earnings picture for the company, and TIF’s beats at earnings season. TIF posted EPS of 97 cents, easily crushing the consensus estimate of 77 cents a share.

The beat was thanks to strong sales, which were up 13% from the year ago quarter, while comparable-store sales also saw a double digit increase as well. And perhaps the best news from the sales beat was the strength across geographic divisions, as Asia-Pacific saw 17% growth, while Japan saw 20% growth, showcasing the strong demand for TIF products across global markets.

Earnings Outlook

Given the strong trend in the luxury and high end corners of the retail world, and TIF’s continued dominance of the space, it shouldn’t be too surprising to note that earnings estimates have been rising for Tiffany stock.

Estimates have risen for both the current year and the next year time frames, with not a single estimate going lower for either period. Now, TIF is projected to see double digit EPS growth for both this year and next, suggesting a strong, durable trend for the company.

And though higher expectations can be difficult to match, investors should take comfort in TIF’s recent history at earnings season. The company has beaten estimates in three of the last four reports, with an average surprise of roughly 15%, so raised expectations shouldn’t be too hard to hit this time around either.

Thanks to these factors, TIF has earned itself a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). This means that we are looking for more outperformance in the months ahead, and that we expect the positive momentum in TIF shares to continue into the fall.

Bottom Line

Not only is TIF in a great position, but there is strength in the industry too. In fact, the retail-jewelry industry is ranked in the top 2% of all industries (at time of writing), so investors can rest assured that a rising tide is lifting all boats in this space.

But while this industry is looking solid overall, TIF is really the pick that is shining bright. The company has seen solid sales growth and earnings beats, while it remains well-positioned to take advantage of the focus on high end retailers and the great trends that are underpinning the space.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Profitable Opportunities in the Stock Forex Metals Energy Bond Markets

On July 23-30, for 7 days only, we are “opening the doors” to our entire line of Pro Services -- free.

Pro Services are the most nimble, opportunity-rich, professional-grade forecasting services we have – covering 48 of the world’s top markets, some 24 hours a day, complete with detailed charts and analysis.

Receive intensive Pro Service forecasts for 5 major market categories:

Stocks (U.S., Europe, Asia)

Currencies (11 biggest forex pairs)

Metals (futures: precious and industrial)

Energy (futures: crude, Brent, nat gas and more)

Interest Rates (futures: bonds in U.S., Europe, Asia)

Chances are, Pro Services are like nothing you’ve experienced before.

Why are we “opening the doors”? Previously, we reserved our Pro line mostly for institutional subscribers. Today, everyone can trade the markets only the pros could trade before. We want you to experience the quality of professional-grade market forecasting. We think you’ll love it.

Click here for the free limited time market forecasts.

Monday, July 21, 2014

Investing in Semiconductor Earnings Growth

The PC industry isn't dead yet.

Intel (INTC - Trend Report) recently posted strong second quarter results, driven in part by strong demand in its core server and PC markets.

Following the Q2 report, analysts revised their estimates significantly higher for both 2014 and 2015. This sent the stock to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

Intel is the world's largest supplier of microprocessors with over 75% of worldwide market share among traditional PCs and servers.

Second Quarter Results

Intel delivered strong second quarter results on July 15. Earnings per share came in at 55 cents, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 52 cents. It was a 41% increase over the same quarter last year.

Net revenue grew 8% year-over-year to $13.831 billion, well ahead of the consensus of $13.622 billion. This was driven by solid demand in its core server and PC markets. Intel's Data Center (server) group saw top-line growth of 19% year-over-year, while its PC Client Group saw revenue growth of 6%.

Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue improved greatly. The gross margin rose from 58.3% to 64.5%. Meanwhile, marketing, general and administrative expenses declined 5% and fell from 16.9% to 14.9% of revenue.

These factors led to a whopping 41% surge in operating income as the operating margin expanded 21.2% to 27.8%.

Earnings Outlook

Following the strong Q2 results, analysts have unanimously raised their estimates for both 2014 and 2015. This has sent the stock to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

Part of the catalyst for the upward revisions was encouraging guidance from management, which stated in the Q2 report that it expects about 5% revenue growth in 2014. That is slightly higher than its previous guidance.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2014 is now $2.14, up from $2.04 before the report. The 2015 consensus is now $2.31, up from $2.18 over the same period.

Intel still faces long-term challenges as it struggles to gain traction in the growing tablet and smartphone markets. But the near-term outlook looks bright for the stock as the PC industry appears to be stabilizing after two years of contraction.


Shares of Intel soared after the Q2 report and have been on a tear this year, rising more than +32%. But the valuation picture still looks reasonable. Shares trade around 16x 12-month forward earnings and about 9x cash flow.

In addition, the company pays a dividend that yields a solid 2.7%.

The Bottom Line

Intel has a dominant position in the microprocessor industry for traditional PCs and servers. And thanks to recent strength in these end markets, along with solid cost controls from the company, earnings growth - and earnings estimates - are soaring for Intel.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Friday, July 18, 2014

How to Start a Financial Crisis Part 2

How Financial Crises Start, Part 2 by Market Authority

Click Here to Review Part 1

Yesterday, I highlighted the financial panics of the 19th Century (aka bank runs), how they start, and the government’s response to prevent future runs (the Fed and FDIC). As noted, regulators and economists are only able to locate the problems with the engine after the car breaks down.

Today, let’s take a look under the hood of our current financial system to better understand how the economic machine overheated and was left stranded by the side of the road.

Businesses are more profitable than ever with record amounts of cash on balance sheets. The following chart depicts the rise of corporate cash as a % of GDP:

Since this cash must be invested somewhere (usually short-term), Wall Street created the repo and commercial paper markets. This allowed Wall Street to borrow cash from Main Street on a short-term basis. Just like a pawn shop, lenders of cash need some type of collateral that they can liquidate if the borrower doesn’t pay back the cash on time. Wall Street took the borrowed money to finance higher-yielding assets, profiting on the spread between what they paid on the corporate cash versus what they received on the higher-yielding assets.

Historically, the collateral that Wall Street pledged in order to borrow short-term corporate cash was AAA-rated US Treasuries. However, the government surplus of the late 90s mopped up too much Treasury supply. Wall Street needed another asset to use as collateral. And then Wall Street developed a game changer: securitization.

This process moves long-term bank loans off balance sheets by packaging them together and selling them to the capital markets. Securitized loans, also knowns as Asset-Backed Securities (ABS), are backed by mortgages, auto loans, credit card loans, or student loans and now comprise one of the largest markets in the world. A market large enough to provide collateral for the enormous amount of short-term borrowing.

Technology made securitization possible. Software programs can easily package millions of similar loans, something impossible to do by hand. Furthermore, easy-to-obtain credit scores allow lenders to assess the likelihood of default of each individual loan.

Here’s a brief primer on how these loans work:

Let’s say you live in a town called Springfield where 10,000 residents own houses with $200,000 mortgages that are held at the local Citibank. The average resident is paying a 10% rate on their mortgage and they all have 20 years to maturity. Since the bank can expect interest payments totaling $200mm per year (10,000 x $200,000 x 10%), they can create a new special purpose vehicle which separates these payments into different buckets. Because the bank can guarantee that the first $50mm of interest payments will go to the first bucket, the rating agencies give this a higher rating (even though the underlying collateral may be lower rated).

Securitization provided the necessary AAA collateral for Wall Street to borrow from the rest of the private sector.

Now think of this operation like the world’s largest pawn shop. The corporations (with the cash) are the pawnbrokers willing to lend cash to the banks as long as they provide adequate collateral. Typically, the corporations would lend cash at a rate of 1 to 1. So if Wall Street brought in a gold chain (or a AAA ABS) that was valued at $1000, the pawnbroker would lend them $1000 and hold onto the gold chain until Wall Street paid them back.

Wall Street would then take this cash and use it to securitize more loans, which could then be used as more collateral. This process drove the credit super-cycle in a very pyramid-scheme like way.

Tomorrow, I’ll discuss how the system began to crack when the pawnbrokers began requiring more collateral.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

How to Start a Financial Crisis

How Financial Crises Start, Part 1 by Market Authority

Today is the start of a multi-part series on the financial crisis: what was the cause and what have we learned.

When I lived overseas, I was the proud owner of a 1982 Toyota FJ40. Designed as an offroad vehicle, this 4-cylinder diesel could climb just about anything. I’m no gearhead, so once the truck started experiencing problems, fixing it was quite the learning experience. Some issues were easy to fix, such as replacing cheap glow plugs with a higher quality set or a worn down hose with a newer one. While I’m still not an expert on diesel engines, I’m now more familiar with how they operate and can diagnose simple problems when they arrive. The universal truth is that nobody really wonders how the engine works until it fails to start in the morning.

And the same principle applies to financial markets. Only when a crisis happens, do we pop open the hood and take a look at the problems with the system. We discover issues that a previous mechanic may have installed incorrectly or parts that need to be entirely replaced due to overuse. Some of these may be quick fixes while others may require a complete rebuild.

Every financial crisis starts with a complete loss of confidence in what’s under the hood. When fear is prevalent, investors sell assets and raise cash. Because of this action, the economy loses the financing necessary to grow and output falls.

The financial crisis of 2008 allowed us to diagnose the problems in our financial system and propose solutions to avoid similar events in the future. This is how economic systems evolve, through a crisis/recovery process leading to a better understanding of how the entire system operates.

For instance, before the Federal Reserve was created in 1914, bank runs were a national pastime. At every peak in the business cycle, depositors would worry that their local bank had underwritten too many bad loans. Fearing their cash was no longer safe, they would line up outside the local bank demanding their money back. This was a powerful signal. If you were walking through town and witnessed your neighbors waiting anxiously (and sometimes angrily) in line, you were likely to inquire what all the fuss was about. When you were told your money was at risk, you would likely join the line, reinforcing the signal. The risk of losing all of your deposit was much greater than the reward earned from keeping it in the bank.

In a fractional reserve banking system, banks never keep enough deposits on hand to pay everyone back at the same time. They don’t need to, unless a crisis occurs and all depositors are suddenly fearful of what might happen to their deposits. The bank run became a self-fulfilling prophecy, with the bank usually closing down, halting withdrawals, and declaring a “bank holiday” while it went about selling assets (in a fire sale) to raise the cash needed to satisfy withdrawals. As a result, the bank would usually close and it would take years for a new bank to repair relations with depositors and get the economy moving again.

This is essentially why the Fed and FDIC insurance were created: to stop bank runs and smooth out the business cycle. The Fed will provide the needed liquidity for the bank (they can borrow at the discount window) and the FDIC gives depositors the peace of mind that their cash will always be protected. If a crisis occurs, there’s no longer a need to withdraw your cash and bury it in the backyard. Thus, the bank runs of the 19th Century are all but extinct.

The Federal reserve as a backstop and FDIC insurance led to what Yale economist Gary Gorton describes as “the Quiet Period” in our economy: the period from 1934 to 2007 when “properly designed bank regulations prevented financial crisis for a significant period of time, until innovation and change necessitated their redesign”. Crisis brought about an evolution in understanding, which allowed for the development of regulatory systems targeted at preventing future crises.

And things got really quiet towards the end of the quiet period during the “great moderation”. Between the mid-1980s and 2007, economic volatility declined dramatically. The Fed had seemingly smoothed out the business cycle.

While economists understood some of the factors causing the great moderation (central bank independence and counter-cyclical economic stabilization), they didn’t foresee the problems under the hood until the 2008 financial crisis occurred.

Tomorrow, we’ll take a look under the hood and discuss the shadow banking system. This will allow us to understand how bank runs can still occur in the 21st Century.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, July 14, 2014

Investing in Industrial Energy Solutions Earnings Growth

EnerSys (ENS) has powered through the last several quarters producing 11 straight beats of the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Today, ENS is a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), and it is the Bull of the Day.

Powerful Earnings

Aggressive growth investors appreciate beats. They love them on the bottom line, but they really want to see them on top too. ENS has recorded six straight quarters where the company beat on top and bottom.

Another key metric that aggressive growth investors look for is larger and larger beats of the bottom line. ENS has that too. Over the last three quarts, the positive earnings surprise has increased from 3.5% to 3.9% to 7.3%.

Company Description

EnerSys makes industrial batteries and backup power systems and power related equipment and accessories. EnerSys was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania.

Most Recent Quarter

ENS reported a strong 1Q14 beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.10 by eight cents. The company reported revenues of $665M when the street was calling for $657M in the quarter. The $8M top line beat translated into a 1.2% revenue surprise.

The stock moved higher by 2.5% in the session following the earnings announcement.

Prior To That Beat

Prior to the most recent beat, ENS not only provided a solid beat, they also gave positive guidance. A big beat on the top line drove the company to guide Wall Street to earnings per share between $1.08 and $1.12 for the next quarter when the consensus was calling for $1.05.

Guiding above consensus is a surefire way to please investors, and as a result of the positive guidance, the stock was bid up more than 9% in the session following that release.

ENS Sees Estimates Moving Higher

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2014 for ENS has been increasing all year. Starting at $4.00 in October of last year, we saw a nice move higher to $4.24 in November. By February, the estimate had kicked higher to $4.38 and now the Zacks Consensus Estimate is at $4.48.

The 2015 Zacks Consensus Estimate has only been around for a few months. The estimate remains where it started out at $4.84 as analysts have limited visibility at this point, but should release full year 2015 estimates following the next quarter.


The valuation for ENS is very attractive, as the stock trades at a discount the industry average for all the major metrics investors tend to look at. The trailing PE of 17x comes in under the 19x industry average as the the more attractive forward PE of 15x compared to 18x industry average. The price to book shows a healthy discount as well (2.5x vs 3.9x) as does the price to sales multiple (1.4x vs 1.8x).

The company is expected to produce revenue growth of 9% in Fiscal 2015, while the industry average is calling for a decrease of 1% on the top line. Earnings growth of 13% for ENS is above the 8% industry expectation.

In looking for a reason that this stock trades at a discount, the only thing that I could come up with is a lower net margin of 6.1% compared to a 6.8% and a lower pre-tax margin of 6.6% compared to 9.7% for the industry.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Short-Term Pullbacks and Long-Term Gains Explained

Why CNBC Wants You To Be Concerned About Your Money by Market Authority

In the days before financial news media broadcasted market information around-the-clock with scrolling pre-market quotes and endless “Breaking News” segments;

In the days before online brokerages marked your net worth up or down with every tick in the S&P 500 while simultaneously pitching products designed to squelch those worries;

In the days before 100s of virtual and real analysts dissected, projected, and connected every data point from presidential poll data to Chinese PMI’s;

In the days before every word, facial tic, hand gesture, and suit color worn by Janet Yellen was scrutinized, humanized, and hypothesized;

In these oft-forgotten days, there was one man and one show that investors turned on and tuned in for their financial news: “Wall $treet Week with Louis Rukeyser”.

This original financial news show aired on PBS from 1970-2002, and hit peak popularity in the mid-80s. Some would argue its appeal led to the launch of CNBC. Rukeyser is best known for his pun-filled humor and attempts to shift investor’s focus from the short-term market gyrations to the long-term. Along with countless awards and recognitions for outstanding journalism, People magazine once named him the “sex symbol of economics”.

Rukeyser sadly departed in 2006 at the age of 73, but many of his broadcasting memories are still alive on YouTube. Here’s a clip from shortly after the October 1987 crash (fast forward to 1:40 mark for Rukeyser’s monologue):

And the money quote:

“Ok, let’s start with what’s really important tonight… It’s just your money, not your life. Everybody who really loved you a week ago still loves you tonight. And that’s a heckuva lot more important than the numbers on a brokerage statement. The robins will sing, the crocuses will bloom, babies will gurgle, and puppies will curl up in your lap and drift happily to sleep- even when the stock market goes temporarily insane! And now that that’s all fully in perspective, let me say Ouch! … and Eeek! … and Medic! Tonight we’re going to try to make sense of mass hysteria, to look behind the crash of ‘87, and most perilously but most important of all, to look ahead.”

If you listened to Rukeyser in 1987 and held on to your stocks, you’ve witnessed a 10-fold increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average in the past 3 decades. This return outperforms every major asset group. Note, his calmness during the crash contrasts the current state of financial news. While Rukeyser helped investors focus on the long-term, modern financial news wants investors to focus on the short-term.

In the short-term, every piece of news is “Breaking”, significant, meaningful, and market moving. In the long-term, none of these events individually matter. They’re merely noise.

Financial news networks (CNBC, CNNfn, Fox Business, Bloomberg TV) focus on the short-term to create the narrative that you should always be concerned about your money. This narrative is essential for their business model: Concern drives viewership, and viewership sells advertising time- the veritable raison d’ĂȘtre of financial news.

Without concern that a grand piano tethered to a loose string is looming over the market, people would stop watching and the ad dollars would migrate to other channels. Exciting program titles such as “Squawk Box”, “Mad Money”, “Fast Money”, and “Power Lunch”, emphasize your need to be concerned.

Take a look at CNBC’s viewership numbers over the past 17 years:

Viewership spiked at times when investors were concerned: the tech bubble and the financial crisis. Fully cognizant of these numbers, CNBC creates the illusory narrative that a market moving event is lurking around the corner. An event that needs to be closely watched because this event could wreck your portfolio. If CNBC anchors are talking about an upcoming event, the risk is likely priced into the stock market.

Known risks don’t cause unexpected selloffs. Known risks mean that investors are making contingency plans through hedging or selling stocks. Known risks mean that the market is braced for the event and its impact should be muted. Known risks mean that the market is more likely to be higher after the event passes.

For instance, have a look at the 43% rally in the SPY over the past 2 years:

Every little dip along the uptrend represents events that might have derailed the markets, but eventually turned out to be inconsequential. Remember these negative narratives from the past 2 years:

The Fiscal Cliff
Government Shutdown
Debt Ceiling Negotiations
Russia Invades Ukraine
China – Japan Tensions

While each caused short-term pullbacks, none of these events changed the current drivers of stocks: low interest rates, buybacks, strong earnings growth, and a gradually improving economy. These are long-term drivers that are resistant to change once set in motion. If Louis Rukeyser were still around today, he would be humorously highlighting these positive long-term themes, not the negative short-term narratives.

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence

Monday, July 07, 2014

Investing in Luxury Fashion Earnings Growth

Michael Kors (KORS) is continuing its fabulous run as the leading luxury fashion brand displacing peers like Coach (COH). The company delivered yet another stellar quarterly performance in late May when it reported Q4 EPS of $0.78, beating the consensus by 15% while rising 56% year over year.

Revenues of $917 million beat the consensus by 12% and grew 54% year over year. Further, the company's strong comps gain of 26% made it their 32nd straight quarter of positive same-store sales. In Europe, revenue skyrocketed 125%, with comps launching 63% higher. That's powerful growth for an $18 billion clothier.

And analysts responded across the board by raising earnings estimates and price targets. The current year EPS consensus estimate moved to $3.94 from $3.82, representing 22.5% growth. Next year was lifted to $4.70 from $4.56 indicating potential year over year growth of 19%.

Most price targets were moved slightly higher into a range of $105 to $115. Reportedly, Goldman Sachs was the outlier with a bump from $120 to $134, but I have not seen that report.

But investor reaction has been mixed as Wall Street digested information about declining gross margins. It seems there were questions about the available runway for this growth story and if investors were willing to pay more than 20X for EPS growth that might be leveling off to 20%.

A Long Bias for KORS

I think the KORS craze and market penetration globally is far from over. Especially when they work so hard to have so many fashion accessories at so many price points. Their "accessible luxury" strategy speaks to, and opens the wallets and purses of, more than the affluent.

I have traded KORS stock twice in the past year for my FTM portfolio, first buying last July at $63 and bagging 25%. Then we bought again in December in anticipation of a great holiday quarter. We were not disappointed as we caught the big February pop to new highs above $90 and grabbed 12% gains.

Though I am a big fan of the Michael Kors company, its products, and its marketing strategies and global growth opportunities, I rely on the retail analysts who focus on the industry to sort out the real potential of the stock as an investment.

What Do the Analysts See in KORS?

What made me buy the stock again in June, besides the core growth story still being strong, is that I liked the commentary from several analysts. Here's a sampling...

JPMorgan analysts revisited KORS in last June after British handbag retailer Mulberry reported dismal sales efforts in high-end bags. They raised estimates, even introducing their FY16 EPS number of $4.80 (we are currently in Q2 of KORS FY15 which ends next March). They also raised their PT from $100 to $104 based on 25-26X their FY15 estimate of $4.00, or 21-22X their FY16.

Europe, Men's, and jewelry markets/categories are considered "$1 billion opportunities" for the company by the JPM analysts and these areas will drive growth beyond women's handbags. Though the bears here could still force a test of $86 and lower, I am confident this stock will be approaching $100 again in the next six months.

Deutsche Bank analysts raised their price target from $105 to $110 and had this to say in response to the gross margin concerns...

"While there are many moving parts to this increasingly complex global company, the bottom line we believe is that Kors once again delivered on both results & guidance. Though FY15 plan came in at least in-line with expectation, even so, we believe management is being conservative. Primarily, we note that plan calls for gross margin normalization, but management made it clear that hasn’t happened yet (and we don't think that back-half of 1Q compares get more difficult)."

Piper Jaffray analyst Erinn Murphy met with management recently and had many good things to say about their plans and solid execution. She reiterated her Overweight rating and $115 price target.

"Management was bullish not only on near-term trends but also on the multi-category opportunity for further market share gains over time. We believe Q1 comps are tracking above 20% globally. The company is investing behind e-com, product, supply chain, stores and people as sales continue to grow in the range of $1B/year. We expect operating margins in the 29% range for the next two years. Our recent European checks confirm that the brand is taking significant 'white space' that exists below high-end luxury."

The big take away for me was that these analysts and others are as bullish on KORS for the longer-term as I am. They see the international opportunity as still being in the early innings and they view the handbag wars (which KORS is still winning) as only one battlefield they excel on.

The Global Opportunity

The $75 billion accessories category of the global luxury goods markets is the fastest-growing sub-sector of apparel. And this is 85% of KORS current sales.

Management sees the potential for 700 stores internationally, including 400 in North America (currently 288), 200 in Europe (80), and 100 in Japan (37), with potential to eventually acquire licensed Asian geographies. KORS plans to add 110 stores in F2015, including 45 in North America, 55 in Europe, and 10 in Japan.

According to, "KORS opened 7 stores in the Asia-Pacific region, bringing the total count to 94 stores, including a new flagship store in China. Management expects around 200 retail locations in the Asia-Pacific region. Kors also opened two stores in Brazil, expanding its presence in Latin America. The company currently has seven locations in Latin America and expects it can support 40 retail locations over the next several years."

To solidify their Asia strategy, the company created a new leadership position and filled it with some key talent. Stephane Lafay has been named to the newly created role of President of Asia, reporting to John D. Idol, the company’s Chairman and CEO. From the company's June 30 press release...

Mr. Lafay’s appointment, effective July 28th, 2014, reflects the brand’s powerful momentum in the region and its sustained focus on growth. "This is a pivotal moment for the brand as we continue to invest and work to build a strategic roadmap for the Asia region," says Mr. Idol. "Stephane has a long history of building luxury businesses in Asia. His skills and experience will be a tremendous asset for us going forward."

Mr. Lafay was most recently at Tiffany & Co., where he held the position of Senior Vice President, Asia Pacific and Japan. Lauded for his leadership and in-depth knowledge of the region, he led the brand to consistently strong results.

"The Asian market is an important region for us to develop as we continue to grow our global luxury brand," says Mr. Idol. "We’re excited to take advantage of the momentum our brand has recently generated. In the past two years we’ve been able to double our store count to over 100 locations in the region. Stephane’s experience and leadership will help enable us to capitalize on our momentum in the region."

"I’m delighted to be joining Michael Kors at such an exciting moment in the brand’s development," says Mr. Lafay. "Having worked in Asia for 25 years, and spent nearly two decades building brands in the region, it’s clear to me that there is enormous opportunity for Michael Kors there. I look forward to being part of the team that turns this potential into reality."

It sounds like they picked the right guy for that "enormous opportunity."

Multi-Channel Excellence

According to Baird Equity Research, "KORS utilizes several marketing avenues to project its 'jet-set' image, including print (three 40-page catalogs per year), increasingly online/social media, fashion shows, and editorial (strong relationships with press)." Baird analysts have a $114 price target on KORS.

Obviously, Michael Kors the man now carries the cache of a Ralph Lauren (RL) with global fashion consumers after his celebrity run on the hit show "Project Runway."

What makes KORS above-and-beyond the average retailer is their global reach and brand appeal, their diverse "accessible luxury" lines that attract middle class fashionistas too, and their multi-channel marketing strategies in retail and wholesale. The company strategy is not hit-or-miss like many retailers. They are going for the jugular as THE all-encompassing and innovative lifestyle brand for more than the jetset.

And that's why it was nice to see Steve Mandel of Lone Pine Capital increasing his stake in Q2 by 25% to 11.3 million shares, probably on those dips below $90 in April. He's a conservative fundamentally-driven investor with a long-term view and he's clearly not done watching the KORS growth story take his investment higher.

Neither am I. And that's why I was buying the dips below $90 in June and it's a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

Click Here to Review More Financial Intelligence